Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Actions
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3 Coder Next

At a glance

Anthropic's original fast and compact model.

52200K ctx#75/92

Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.

262K ctx$0.12/$0.80 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI· as of 2026-10-02
Capability
CapabilityECI52.4
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science36.3%
Math
Math Problems14.9%Competition Math1.8%
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math—
Specs
200K
Context
4K
Max output
—
Released
262K
Context
236K
Max output
Feb 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Pricing not available
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.12/M tokens
Output$0.80/M tokens
Cache read$0.07/M tokens
Chat with Claude 3 HaikuGo to model
Chat with Qwen3 Coder NextGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3 Coder Next▼

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Both Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3 Coder Next are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which has a larger context window, Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Qwen3 Coder Next has a larger context window: Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens vs Qwen3 Coder Next at 262K tokens.

Do both Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3 Coder Next support vision?

▼

Claude 3 Haiku supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder Next does not.

What are the key differences between Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Key differences: only Claude 3 Haiku supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3 Coder Next for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App