Anthropic's fast, low-cost Claude Haiku for high-volume work, succeeding Claude Haiku 4.5.
Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Gemma 4 with only 4B active parameters per token.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 4 26B A4B are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Gemma 4 26B A4B has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 input / $0.50 output. Gemma 4 26B A4B: $0.08 input / $0.26 output.
Claude Haiku 5.5 has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1M tokens vs Gemma 4 26B A4B at 262K tokens.
Yes, both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 4 26B A4B support vision/image input.
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 4 26B A4B have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 4 26B A4B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.