Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

At a glance

Anthropic's fast, low-cost Claude Haiku for high-volume work, succeeding Claude Haiku 4.5.

1M ctx$0.10/$0.50 per M

InclusionAI's hybrid vision-language model, layering native visual perception on the Ling 3.0 Flash MoE (124B total, 5.5B active).

262K ctx$0.02/$0.06 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper84%
Specs
1M
Context
128K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
262K
Context
33K
Max output
Sep 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.10/M tokens
Output$0.50/M tokens
Cache read$0.01/M tokens
Cache write$0.13/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input79%$0.02/M tokens
Output88%$0.06/M tokens
Cache read58%$0.004/M tokens
Chat with Claude Haiku 5.5Go to model
Chat with Ling 3.0 Flash VLGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL▼

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

▼

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

▼

Ling 3.0 Flash VL has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 input / $0.50 output. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: $0.02 input / $0.06 output.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

▼

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1M tokens vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL at 262K tokens.

Do both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL support vision?

▼

Yes, both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

▼

Key differences: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App