Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B

At a glance

Anthropic's fast, low-cost Claude Haiku for high-volume work, succeeding Claude Haiku 4.5.

1M ctx$0.10/$0.50 per M

Second-generation Qwen coding model at 32B scale.

5433K ctx$0.66/$1.00 per M#74/92
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper73%
Capability
Capability—
Coding
Code Editing—
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-10-02
Capability
CapabilityECI53.8
Coding
Code Editing16.4%
Specs
1M
Context
128K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
33K
Context
29K
Max output
Nov 2024
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input85%$0.10/M tokens
Output50%$0.50/M tokens
Cache read$0.01/M tokens
Cache write$0.13/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.66/M tokens
Output$1.00/M tokens
Chat with Claude Haiku 5.5Go to model
Chat with Qwen2.5 Coder 32BGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B▼

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B?

▼

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B?

▼

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 input / $0.50 output. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B: $0.66 input / $1.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B?

▼

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1M tokens vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B at 33K tokens.

Do both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B support vision?

▼

Claude Haiku 5.5 supports vision/image input, but Qwen2.5 Coder 32B does not.

What are the key differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B?

▼

Key differences: Claude Haiku 5.5 is significantly cheaper; only Claude Haiku 5.5 supports vision input; only Claude Haiku 5.5 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App