Anthropic's fast, low-cost Claude Haiku for high-volume work, succeeding Claude Haiku 4.5.
Xiaomi's native omnimodal model delivering Pro-level agentic performance at roughly half the inference cost.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo V2.5 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
MiMo V2.5 has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 input / $0.50 output. MiMo V2.5: $0.14 input / $0.28 output.
MiMo V2.5 has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1M tokens vs MiMo V2.5 at 1M tokens.
Yes, both Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo V2.5 support vision/image input.
Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo V2.5 have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo V2.5 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.