Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash

At a glance

Anthropic's fast, low-cost Claude Haiku for high-volume work, succeeding Claude Haiku 4.5.

1M ctx$0.10/$0.50 per M

Xiaomi's open-source efficiency model: a 309B MoE with 15B active parameters per token and a hybrid attention mechanism.

1.0M ctx$0.14/$0.28 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper12%
Specs
1M
Context
128K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
1.0M
Context
131K
Max output
Sep 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input29%$0.10/M tokens
Output$0.50/M tokens
Cache read$0.01/M tokens
Cache write$0.13/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.14/M tokens
Output44%$0.28/M tokens
Cache read72%$0.003/M tokens
Chat with Claude Haiku 5.5Go to model
Chat with MiMo V2.6 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash▼

Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo V2.6 Flash?

▼

Both Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo V2.6 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo V2.6 Flash?

▼

MiMo V2.6 Flash has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 input / $0.50 output. MiMo V2.6 Flash: $0.14 input / $0.28 output.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo V2.6 Flash?

▼

MiMo V2.6 Flash has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 5.5 supports 1M tokens vs MiMo V2.6 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo V2.6 Flash support vision?

▼

Yes, both Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo V2.6 Flash support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo V2.6 Flash?

▼

Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo V2.6 Flash have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo V2.6 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App