Anthropic's new flagship for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work, succeeding Claude Opus 5.
Xiaomi's flagship MiMo V2.6 Pro served for speed: the same 1T checkpoint at roughly 10x the output rate.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Claude Opus 5.5 and MiMo V2.6 Pro UltraSpeed are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
MiMo V2.6 Pro UltraSpeed has a lower blended cost. Claude Opus 5.5: $4.00 input / $20.00 output. MiMo V2.6 Pro UltraSpeed: $4.35 input / $8.70 output.
MiMo V2.6 Pro UltraSpeed has a larger context window: Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1M tokens vs MiMo V2.6 Pro UltraSpeed at 1M tokens.
Yes, both Claude Opus 5.5 and MiMo V2.6 Pro UltraSpeed support vision/image input.
Claude Opus 5.5 and MiMo V2.6 Pro UltraSpeed have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Opus 5.5 and MiMo V2.6 Pro UltraSpeed for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.