Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

At a glance

Anthropic's flagship for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work.

1M ctx$5.00/$25.00 per M

Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.

262K ctx$0.11/$0.80 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper97%
Specs
1M
Context
128K
Max output
Jul 2026
Released
262K
Context
128K
Max output
Feb 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$5.00/M tokens
Output$25.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.50/M tokens
Cache write$6.25/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input98%$0.11/M tokens
Output97%$0.80/M tokens
Cache read86%$0.07/M tokens
Chat with Claude Opus 5Go to model
Chat with Qwen3 Coder NextGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 Coder Next▼

Which is better, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 Coder Next are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Qwen3 Coder Next has a lower blended cost. Claude Opus 5: $5.00 input / $25.00 output. Qwen3 Coder Next: $0.11 input / $0.80 output.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Claude Opus 5 has a larger context window: Claude Opus 5 supports 1M tokens vs Qwen3 Coder Next at 262K tokens.

Do both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 Coder Next support vision?

▼

Claude Opus 5 supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder Next does not.

What are the key differences between Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Key differences: Qwen3 Coder Next is significantly cheaper; only Claude Opus 5 supports vision input; only Claude Opus 5 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 Coder Next for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App