Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Seed 1.6 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next

At a glance

Fast variant of Seed 1.6 for low-latency applications.

262K ctx$0.07/$0.30 per M

Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.

262K ctx$0.11/$0.80 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper54%
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Specs
262K
Context
33K
Max output
Dec 2025
Released
262K
Context
128K
Max output
Feb 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input32%$0.07/M tokens
Output63%$0.30/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.11/M tokens
Output$0.80/M tokens
Cache read$0.07/M tokens
Chat with Seed 1.6 FlashGo to model
Chat with Qwen3 Coder NextGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Seed 1.6 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next▼

Which is better, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Both Seed 1.6 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Next are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Seed 1.6 Flash has a lower blended cost. Seed 1.6 Flash: $0.07 input / $0.30 output. Qwen3 Coder Next: $0.11 input / $0.80 output.

Which has a larger context window, Seed 1.6 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Seed 1.6 Flash has a larger context window: Seed 1.6 Flash supports 262K tokens vs Qwen3 Coder Next at 262K tokens.

Do both Seed 1.6 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Next support vision?

▼

Seed 1.6 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder Next does not.

What are the key differences between Seed 1.6 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Key differences: only Seed 1.6 Flash supports vision input; only Seed 1.6 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Seed 1.6 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Next for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App