Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

At a glance

DeepSeek's October 2026 checkpoint of the V4.1 Flash workhorse, refreshed for stronger agentic coding with shorter, faster answers.

1.0M ctx$0.15/$0.60 per M

Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.

262K ctx$0.12/$0.80 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper9%
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Specs
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
262K
Context
236K
Max output
Feb 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.15/M tokens
Output25%$0.60/M tokens
Cache read96%$0.003/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input20%$0.12/M tokens
Output$0.80/M tokens
Cache read$0.07/M tokens
Chat with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Go to model
Chat with Qwen3 Coder NextGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3 Coder Next▼

Which is better, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3 Coder Next are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a lower blended cost. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: $0.15 input / $0.60 output. Qwen3 Coder Next: $0.12 input / $0.80 output.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a larger context window: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 supports 1M tokens vs Qwen3 Coder Next at 262K tokens.

Do both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3 Coder Next support vision?

▼

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder Next does not.

What are the key differences between DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Key differences: only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 supports vision input; only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3 Coder Next for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App