Google's open multimodal model with 128K context and 140+ language support.
Anthropic's fast, low-cost Claude Haiku for high-volume work, succeeding Claude Haiku 4.5.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Gemma 3 27B and Claude Haiku 5.5 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Gemma 3 27B has a lower blended cost. Gemma 3 27B: $0.08 input / $0.45 output. Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 input / $0.50 output.
Claude Haiku 5.5 has a larger context window: Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens vs Claude Haiku 5.5 at 1M tokens.
Yes, both Gemma 3 27B and Claude Haiku 5.5 support vision/image input.
Key differences: only Claude Haiku 5.5 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemma 3 27B and Claude Haiku 5.5 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.