Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Gemma 4 with only 4B active parameters per token.
Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Coder Next are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Gemma 4 26B A4B has a lower blended cost. Gemma 4 26B A4B: $0.07 input / $0.34 output. Qwen3 Coder Next: $0.11 input / $0.80 output.
Gemma 4 26B A4B has a larger context window: Gemma 4 26B A4B supports 262K tokens vs Qwen3 Coder Next at 262K tokens.
Gemma 4 26B A4B supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder Next does not.
Key differences: only Gemma 4 26B A4B supports vision input; only Gemma 4 26B A4B offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3 Coder Next for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.