Google's fourth-generation open dense model with native multimodal understanding.
Fast variant of Seed 1.6 for low-latency applications.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Gemma 4 31B and Seed 1.6 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Seed 1.6 Flash has a lower blended cost. Gemma 4 31B: $0.12 input / $0.37 output. Seed 1.6 Flash: $0.07 input / $0.30 output.
Gemma 4 31B has a larger context window: Gemma 4 31B supports 262K tokens vs Seed 1.6 Flash at 262K tokens.
Yes, both Gemma 4 31B and Seed 1.6 Flash support vision/image input.
Gemma 4 31B and Seed 1.6 Flash have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemma 4 31B and Seed 1.6 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.