Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Claude Haiku 5.5

At a glance

InclusionAI's hybrid vision-language model, layering native visual perception on the Ling 3.0 Flash MoE (124B total, 5.5B active).

262K ctx$0.02/$0.06 per M

Anthropic's fast, low-cost Claude Haiku for high-volume work, succeeding Claude Haiku 4.5.

1M ctx$0.10/$0.50 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper84%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Specs
262K
Context
33K
Max output
Sep 2026
Released
1M
Context
128K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input79%$0.02/M tokens
Output88%$0.06/M tokens
Cache read58%$0.004/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.10/M tokens
Output$0.50/M tokens
Cache read$0.01/M tokens
Cache write$0.13/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with Ling 3.0 Flash VLGo to model
Chat with Claude Haiku 5.5Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Claude Haiku 5.5▼

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Claude Haiku 5.5?

▼

Both Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Claude Haiku 5.5 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Claude Haiku 5.5?

▼

Ling 3.0 Flash VL has a lower blended cost. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: $0.02 input / $0.06 output. Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 input / $0.50 output.

Which has a larger context window, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Claude Haiku 5.5?

▼

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a larger context window: Ling 3.0 Flash VL supports 262K tokens vs Claude Haiku 5.5 at 1M tokens.

Do both Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Claude Haiku 5.5 support vision?

▼

Yes, both Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Claude Haiku 5.5 support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Claude Haiku 5.5?

▼

Key differences: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Claude Haiku 5.5 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App