Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

At a glance

InclusionAI's hybrid vision-language model, layering native visual perception on the Ling 3.0 Flash MoE (124B total, 5.5B active).

262K ctx$0.02/$0.06 per M

DeepSeek's cost-efficient V4.1 tier and the first model built on the Causal Encoder-Decoder (CED) architecture: a 552B MoE activating 8B parameters on input and 16B on output.

1.0M ctx$0.03/$0.50 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper79%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Specs
262K
Context
33K
Max output
Sep 2026
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Sep 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input30%$0.02/M tokens
Output88%$0.06/M tokens
Cache read58%$0.004/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.03/M tokens
Output$0.50/M tokens
Cache read$0.01/M tokens
Chat with Ling 3.0 Flash VLGo to model
Chat with DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash▼

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

▼

Both Ling 3.0 Flash VL and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

▼

Ling 3.0 Flash VL has a lower blended cost. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: $0.02 input / $0.06 output. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.03 input / $0.50 output.

Which has a larger context window, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

▼

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a larger context window: Ling 3.0 Flash VL supports 262K tokens vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Ling 3.0 Flash VL and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash support vision?

▼

Yes, both Ling 3.0 Flash VL and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Ling 3.0 Flash VL and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

▼

Ling 3.0 Flash VL and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Ling 3.0 Flash VL and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App