Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs GLM 5.3

At a glance

InclusionAI's hybrid vision-language model, layering native visual perception on the Ling 3.0 Flash MoE (124B total, 5.5B active).

262K ctx$0.02/$0.06 per M

Z.ai's large-scale reasoning flagship for complex software engineering and long-horizon agent tasks.

1.0M ctx$0.22/$3.39 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper97%
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—Factual Recall—
Math
Competition Math—
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-10-02
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science90.9%Factual Recall41.0%
Math
Competition Math91.1%
Specs
262K
Context
33K
Max output
Sep 2026
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input91%$0.02/M tokens
Output98%$0.06/M tokens
Cache read98%$0.004/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.22/M tokens
Output$3.39/M tokens
Cache read$0.18/M tokens
Chat with Ling 3.0 Flash VLGo to model
Chat with GLM 5.3Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs GLM 5.3▼

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or GLM 5.3?

▼

Both Ling 3.0 Flash VL and GLM 5.3 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or GLM 5.3?

▼

Ling 3.0 Flash VL has a lower blended cost. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: $0.02 input / $0.06 output. GLM 5.3: $0.22 input / $3.39 output.

Which has a larger context window, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or GLM 5.3?

▼

GLM 5.3 has a larger context window: Ling 3.0 Flash VL supports 262K tokens vs GLM 5.3 at 1M tokens.

Do both Ling 3.0 Flash VL and GLM 5.3 support vision?

▼

Ling 3.0 Flash VL supports vision/image input, but GLM 5.3 does not.

What are the key differences between Ling 3.0 Flash VL and GLM 5.3?

▼

Key differences: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is significantly cheaper; only Ling 3.0 Flash VL supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Ling 3.0 Flash VL and GLM 5.3 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App