Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Ling 3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3

At a glance

InclusionAI's fast hybrid-reasoning MoE, 560B total with 25B active.

262K ctx$0/$0 per M

Z.ai's large-scale reasoning flagship for complex software engineering and long-horizon agent tasks.

1.0M ctx$0.22/$3.39 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
No benchmarks available

This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.

Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-10-02
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science90.9%Factual Recall41.0%
Math
Competition Math91.1%
Specs
262K
Context
33K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0/M
Output$0/M
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.22/M tokens
Output$3.39/M tokens
Cache read$0.18/M tokens
Chat with Ling 3.1 FlashGo to model
Chat with GLM 5.3Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Ling 3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3▼

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or GLM 5.3?

▼

Both Ling 3.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which has a larger context window, Ling 3.1 Flash or GLM 5.3?

▼

GLM 5.3 has a larger context window: Ling 3.1 Flash supports 262K tokens vs GLM 5.3 at 1M tokens.

What are the key differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and GLM 5.3?

▼

Ling 3.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Ling 3.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App