Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Llama 3.1 8B vs Gemma 4 31B

At a glance

Compact 8B model from Meta's Llama 3.1 series.

50131K ctx$0.05/$0.08 per M#76/92

Google's fourth-generation open dense model with native multimodal understanding.

262K ctx$0.12/$0.37 per M
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper68%
Capability
CapabilityECI50.3
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science25.9%Factual Recall—
Math
Math Problems22.9%Competition Math2.5%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—Factual Recall9.6%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math—
Specs
131K
Context
66K
Max output
Jul 2024
Released
262K
Context
16K
Max output
Apr 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input58%$0.05/M tokens
Output78%$0.08/M tokens
Cache read$0.02/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.12/M tokens
Output$0.37/M tokens
Chat with Llama 3.1 8BGo to model
Chat with Gemma 4 31BGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Llama 3.1 8B vs Gemma 4 31B▼

Which is better, Llama 3.1 8B or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Both Llama 3.1 8B and Gemma 4 31B are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Llama 3.1 8B has a lower blended cost. Llama 3.1 8B: $0.05 input / $0.08 output. Gemma 4 31B: $0.12 input / $0.37 output.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 8B or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Gemma 4 31B has a larger context window: Llama 3.1 8B supports 131K tokens vs Gemma 4 31B at 262K tokens.

Do both Llama 3.1 8B and Gemma 4 31B support vision?

▼

Gemma 4 31B supports vision/image input, but Llama 3.1 8B does not.

What are the key differences between Llama 3.1 8B and Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Key differences: Llama 3.1 8B is significantly cheaper; only Gemma 4 31B supports vision input; only Gemma 4 31B offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Llama 3.1 8B and Gemma 4 31B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App