Meta's open-weight 30B multimodal model, distilled from Muse Spark for autonomous agents on consumer hardware.
Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3 Coder Next are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Qwen3 Coder Next has a lower blended cost. Muse Glimmer 30B: $0.30 input / $1.10 output. Qwen3 Coder Next: $0.11 input / $0.80 output.
Qwen3 Coder Next has a larger context window: Muse Glimmer 30B supports 131K tokens vs Qwen3 Coder Next at 262K tokens.
Muse Glimmer 30B supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder Next does not.
Key differences: Qwen3 Coder Next is significantly cheaper; only Muse Glimmer 30B supports vision input; only Muse Glimmer 30B offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3 Coder Next for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.