Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3 Coder Next

At a glance

12B model from Mistral and NVIDIA — efficient and multilingual.

131K ctx$0.02/$0.03 per M

Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.

262K ctx$0.11/$0.80 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper92%
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Specs
131K
Context
16K
Max output
Jul 2024
Released
262K
Context
128K
Max output
Feb 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input83%$0.02/M tokens
Output96%$0.03/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.11/M tokens
Output$0.80/M tokens
Cache read$0.07/M tokens
Chat with Mistral NemoGo to model
Chat with Qwen3 Coder NextGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3 Coder Next▼

Which is better, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Both Mistral Nemo and Qwen3 Coder Next are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Mistral Nemo has a lower blended cost. Mistral Nemo: $0.02 input / $0.03 output. Qwen3 Coder Next: $0.11 input / $0.80 output.

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Qwen3 Coder Next has a larger context window: Mistral Nemo supports 131K tokens vs Qwen3 Coder Next at 262K tokens.

What are the key differences between Mistral Nemo and Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Key differences: Mistral Nemo is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Mistral Nemo and Qwen3 Coder Next for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App