Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Kimi K2.6 vs Gemma 4 31B

At a glance

MoonshotAI's next-generation multimodal model built for long-horizon coding and multi-agent orchestration.

83262K ctx$0.68/$3.42 per M#17/92

Google's fourth-generation open dense model with native multimodal understanding.

262K ctx$0.12/$0.37 per M
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI82.9
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science90.8%Factual Recall305%38.7%
Math
Competition Math96.1%Research Math39.0%
Coding
Real-World Coding76.7%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper87%
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—Factual Recall9.6%
Math
Competition Math—Research Math—
Coding
Real-World Coding—
Specs
262K
Context
128K
Max output
Apr 2026
Released
262K
Context
16K
Max output
Apr 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.68/M tokens
Output$3.42/M tokens
Cache read$0.14/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input82%$0.12/M tokens
Output89%$0.37/M tokens
Chat with Kimi K2.6Go to model
Chat with Gemma 4 31BGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Kimi K2.6 vs Gemma 4 31B▼

Which is better, Kimi K2.6 or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Both Kimi K2.6 and Gemma 4 31B are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Gemma 4 31B has a lower blended cost. Kimi K2.6: $0.68 input / $3.42 output. Gemma 4 31B: $0.12 input / $0.37 output.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.6 or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Kimi K2.6 has a larger context window: Kimi K2.6 supports 262K tokens vs Gemma 4 31B at 262K tokens.

Do both Kimi K2.6 and Gemma 4 31B support vision?

▼

Yes, both Kimi K2.6 and Gemma 4 31B support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Kimi K2.6 and Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Key differences: Gemma 4 31B is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Kimi K2.6 and Gemma 4 31B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App