NVIDIA's open multimodal mixture-of-experts model, with 12B active parameters out of 120B total.
Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 Coder Next are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has a lower blended cost. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: $0.10 input / $0.40 output. Qwen3 Coder Next: $0.12 input / $0.80 output.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has a larger context window: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL supports 262K tokens vs Qwen3 Coder Next at 262K tokens.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder Next does not.
Key differences: only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL supports vision input; only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 Coder Next for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.