Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K vs Gemma 4 31B

At a glance

GPT 3.5 Turbo with extended 16K context window.

16K ctx$3.00/$4.00 per M

Google's fourth-generation open dense model with native multimodal understanding.

262K ctx$0.20/$0.40 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—Factual Recall—
Math
Competition Math—
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-10-02
Cheaper92%
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science75.8%Factual Recall10.4%
Math
Competition Math73.3%
Specs
16K
Context
4K
Max output
Aug 2023
Released
262K
Context
16K
Max output
Apr 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$3.00/M tokens
Output$4.00/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input93%$0.20/M tokens
Output90%$0.40/M tokens
Chat with GPT 3.5 Turbo 16KGo to model
Chat with Gemma 4 31BGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K vs Gemma 4 31B▼

Which is better, GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Both GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K and Gemma 4 31B are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Gemma 4 31B has a lower blended cost. GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K: $3.00 input / $4.00 output. Gemma 4 31B: $0.20 input / $0.40 output.

Which has a larger context window, GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Gemma 4 31B has a larger context window: GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K supports 16K tokens vs Gemma 4 31B at 262K tokens.

Do both GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K and Gemma 4 31B support vision?

▼

Gemma 4 31B supports vision/image input, but GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K does not.

What are the key differences between GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K and Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Key differences: Gemma 4 31B is significantly cheaper; only Gemma 4 31B supports vision input; only Gemma 4 31B offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both GPT 3.5 Turbo 16K and Gemma 4 31B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App