Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

GPT 4o vs Qwen3 Coder Next

At a glance

OpenAI's original omni model supporting text and image inputs.

63128K ctx$2.50/$10.00 per M#64/92

Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.

262K ctx$0.11/$0.80 per M
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI63.0
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science49.2%Expert-Level2.7%
Math
Math Problems53.3%Competition Math6.4%Research Math0.3%
Coding
Real-World Coding31.0%Code Editing23.1%
Agentic
Task Horizon9min
No benchmarks available

This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.

Specs
128K
Context
16K
Max output
May 2024
Released
262K
Context
128K
Max output
Feb 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$2.50/M tokens
Output$10.00/M tokens
Cache read$1.25/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input96%$0.11/M tokens
Output92%$0.80/M tokens
Cache read94%$0.07/M tokens
Chat with GPT 4oGo to model
Chat with Qwen3 Coder NextGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: GPT 4o vs Qwen3 Coder Next▼

Which is better, GPT 4o or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Both GPT 4o and Qwen3 Coder Next are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, GPT 4o or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Qwen3 Coder Next has a lower blended cost. GPT 4o: $2.50 input / $10.00 output. Qwen3 Coder Next: $0.11 input / $0.80 output.

Which has a larger context window, GPT 4o or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Qwen3 Coder Next has a larger context window: GPT 4o supports 128K tokens vs Qwen3 Coder Next at 262K tokens.

Do both GPT 4o and Qwen3 Coder Next support vision?

▼

GPT 4o supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder Next does not.

What are the key differences between GPT 4o and Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Key differences: Qwen3 Coder Next is significantly cheaper; only GPT 4o supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both GPT 4o and Qwen3 Coder Next for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App