Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

o3-mini (High) vs Qwen3 Coder Next

At a glance

o3-mini with reasoning effort set to high for maximum STEM accuracy.

74200K ctx$1.10/$4.40 per M#45/92

Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.

262K ctx$0.11/$0.80 per M
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI73.9
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science77.0%
Math
Math Problems96.5%Competition Math76.9%Research Math12.4%
Coding
Code Editing60.4%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning3.0%
No benchmarks available

This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.

Specs
200K
Context
100K
Max output
Feb 2025
Released
262K
Context
128K
Max output
Feb 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.10/M tokens
Output$4.40/M tokens
Cache read$0.55/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input90%$0.11/M tokens
Output82%$0.80/M tokens
Cache read87%$0.07/M tokens
Chat with o3-mini (High)Go to model
Chat with Qwen3 Coder NextGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: o3-mini (High) vs Qwen3 Coder Next▼

Which is better, o3-mini (High) or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Both o3-mini (High) and Qwen3 Coder Next are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, o3-mini (High) or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Qwen3 Coder Next has a lower blended cost. o3-mini (High): $1.10 input / $4.40 output. Qwen3 Coder Next: $0.11 input / $0.80 output.

Which has a larger context window, o3-mini (High) or Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Qwen3 Coder Next has a larger context window: o3-mini (High) supports 200K tokens vs Qwen3 Coder Next at 262K tokens.

What are the key differences between o3-mini (High) and Qwen3 Coder Next?

▼

Key differences: Qwen3 Coder Next is significantly cheaper; only o3-mini (High) offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both o3-mini (High) and Qwen3 Coder Next for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App