Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Qwen2.5 72B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

At a glance

Large 72B model from the Qwen 2.5 generation.

6333K ctx$0.36/$0.40 per M#65/92

NVIDIA's open frontier reasoning model for orchestration, coding, and deep research.

512K ctx$0.60/$3.60 per M
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI62.8
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science49.1%
Math
Math Problems63.2%Competition Math8.1%
Agentic
Task Horizon5min
No benchmarks available

This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.

Specs
33K
Context
16K
Max output
Sep 2024
Released
512K
Context
16K
Max output
Jun 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input40%$0.36/M tokens
Output89%$0.40/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.60/M tokens
Output$3.60/M tokens
Cache read$0.20/M tokens
Chat with Qwen2.5 72BGo to model
Chat with Nemotron 3 UltraGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen2.5 72B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra▼

Which is better, Qwen2.5 72B or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

▼

Both Qwen2.5 72B and Nemotron 3 Ultra are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

▼

Qwen2.5 72B has a lower blended cost. Qwen2.5 72B: $0.36 input / $0.40 output. Nemotron 3 Ultra: $0.60 input / $3.60 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen2.5 72B or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

▼

Nemotron 3 Ultra has a larger context window: Qwen2.5 72B supports 33K tokens vs Nemotron 3 Ultra at 512K tokens.

What are the key differences between Qwen2.5 72B and Nemotron 3 Ultra?

▼

Key differences: only Nemotron 3 Ultra offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen2.5 72B and Nemotron 3 Ultra for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App