Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Actions
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Qwen2.5 72B vs GLM 5.3 Flash

At a glance

Large 72B model from the Qwen 2.5 generation.

6333K ctx$0.36/$0.40 per M#65/92

Z.ai's efficient multimodal model for fast coding and long-horizon agent tasks.

1.0M ctx$0.15/$0.50 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-10-02
Capability
CapabilityECI62.8
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science49.1%
Math
Math Problems63.2%Competition Math8.1%
Agentic
Task Horizon5min
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-10-02
Cheaper36%
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science83%90.2%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math1066%93.9%
Agentic
Task Horizon—
Specs
33K
Context
16K
Max output
Sep 2024
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.36/M tokens
Output20%$0.40/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input58%$0.15/M tokens
Output$0.50/M tokens
Cache read$0.03/M tokens
Chat with Qwen2.5 72BGo to model
Chat with GLM 5.3 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen2.5 72B vs GLM 5.3 Flash▼

Which is better, Qwen2.5 72B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Both Qwen2.5 72B and GLM 5.3 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash has a lower blended cost. Qwen2.5 72B: $0.36 input / $0.40 output. GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.15 input / $0.50 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen2.5 72B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash has a larger context window: Qwen2.5 72B supports 33K tokens vs GLM 5.3 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen2.5 72B and GLM 5.3 Flash support vision?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen2.5 72B does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen2.5 72B and GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Key differences: GLM 5.3 Flash is significantly cheaper; only GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision input; only GLM 5.3 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen2.5 72B and GLM 5.3 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App