Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Actions
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

At a glance

Second-generation Qwen coding model at 32B scale.

5433K ctx$0.66/$1.00 per M#74/92

NVIDIA's open multimodal mixture-of-experts model, with 12B active parameters out of 120B total.

262K ctx$0.10/$0.40 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-10-02
Capability
CapabilityECI53.8
Coding
Code Editing16.4%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper77%
Capability
Capability—
Coding
Code Editing—
Specs
33K
Context
29K
Max output
Nov 2024
Released
262K
Context
236K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.66/M tokens
Output$1.00/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input85%$0.10/M tokens
Output60%$0.40/M tokens
Cache read$0.08/M tokens
Chat with Qwen2.5 Coder 32BGo to model
Chat with Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL▼

Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

▼

Both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

▼

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has a lower blended cost. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B: $0.66 input / $1.00 output. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: $0.10 input / $0.40 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

▼

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has a larger context window: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B supports 33K tokens vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL at 262K tokens.

Do both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL support vision?

▼

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL supports vision/image input, but Qwen2.5 Coder 32B does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen2.5 Coder 32B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

▼

Key differences: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is significantly cheaper; only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL supports vision input; only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App