Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B vs GLM 5.3 Flash

At a glance

Second-generation Qwen coding model at 32B scale.

5433K ctx$0.66/$1.00 per M#74/92

Z.ai's efficient multimodal model for fast coding and long-horizon agent tasks.

1.0M ctx$0.07/$0.25 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI53.8
Coding
Code Editing16.4%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper84%
Capability
Capability—
Coding
Code Editing—
Specs
33K
Context
16K
Max output
Nov 2024
Released
1.0M
Context
131K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.66/M tokens
Output$1.00/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input89%$0.07/M tokens
Output75%$0.25/M tokens
Cache read$0.01/M tokens
Chat with Qwen2.5 Coder 32BGo to model
Chat with GLM 5.3 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B vs GLM 5.3 Flash▼

Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B and GLM 5.3 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash has a lower blended cost. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B: $0.66 input / $1.00 output. GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.07 input / $0.25 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash has a larger context window: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B supports 33K tokens vs GLM 5.3 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B and GLM 5.3 Flash support vision?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen2.5 Coder 32B does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen2.5 Coder 32B and GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Key differences: GLM 5.3 Flash is significantly cheaper; only GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision input; only GLM 5.3 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B and GLM 5.3 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App