Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Actions
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Qwen Turbo vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

At a glance

Fast and cost-efficient Qwen model for high-throughput applications.

611M ctx#70/92

DeepSeek's October 2026 checkpoint of the V4.1 Flash workhorse, refreshed for stronger agentic coding with shorter, faster answers.

1.0M ctx$0.15/$0.60 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CI 58.1-62.4
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI· as of 2026-10-02
Capability
CapabilityECI60.7
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science41.8%
Math
Math Problems56.2%Competition Math6.1%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math—
Specs
1M
Context
8K
Max output
—
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Pricing not available
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.15/M tokens
Output$0.60/M tokens
Cache read$0.003/M tokens
Chat with Qwen TurboGo to model
Chat with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen Turbo vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017▼

Which is better, Qwen Turbo or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?

▼

Both Qwen Turbo and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen Turbo or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?

▼

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a larger context window: Qwen Turbo supports 1M tokens vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen Turbo and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 support vision?

▼

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 supports vision/image input, but Qwen Turbo does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen Turbo and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?

▼

Key differences: only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 supports vision input; only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen Turbo and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App