Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Actions
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Qwen2.5 VL 72B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

At a glance

Large 72B vision-language model from Qwen 2.5 generation.

63128K ctx$0.80/$1.00 per M#65/92

DeepSeek's October 2026 checkpoint of the V4.1 Flash workhorse, refreshed for stronger agentic coding with shorter, faster answers.

1.0M ctx$0.15/$0.60 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper69%
Specs
128K
Context
64K
Max output
Feb 2025
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.80/M tokens
Output$1.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.40/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input81%$0.15/M tokens
Output40%$0.60/M tokens
Cache read99%$0.003/M tokens
Chat with Qwen2.5 VL 72BGo to model
Chat with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen2.5 VL 72B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017▼

Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?

▼

Both Qwen2.5 VL 72B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 VL 72B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?

▼

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a lower blended cost. Qwen2.5 VL 72B: $0.80 input / $1.00 output. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: $0.15 input / $0.60 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen2.5 VL 72B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?

▼

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a larger context window: Qwen2.5 VL 72B supports 128K tokens vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen2.5 VL 72B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 support vision?

▼

Yes, both Qwen2.5 VL 72B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Qwen2.5 VL 72B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?

▼

Key differences: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is significantly cheaper; only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen2.5 VL 72B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App