Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free

Qwen2.5 VL 72B vs Kimi K3

At a glance
QwenQwen2.5 VL 72B

Large 72B vision-language model from Qwen 2.5 generation.

63128K ctx$0.80/$1.00 per M#65/92
MoonshotAIKimi K3

MoonshotAI's 2.8T-parameter flagship for complex coding, knowledge work, and long-horizon agent runs.

1.0M ctx$3.00/$15.00 per M
AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
QwenQwen2.5 VL 72B
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper
Capability
CapabilityECI62.8
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—Expert-Level—
Agentic
Terminal Tasks—
MoonshotAIKimi K3
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Provider·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-16
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science93.5%Expert-Level43.5%
Agentic
Terminal Tasks88.3%
Specs
QwenQwen2.5 VL 72B
128K
Context
64K
Max output
Feb 2025
Released
MoonshotAIKimi K3
1.0M
Context
16K
Max output
Jul 2026
Released
Capabilities
QwenQwen2.5 VL 72B
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
MoonshotAIKimi K3
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
QwenQwen2.5 VL 72B
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.80/M tokens
Output$1.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.40/M tokens
MoonshotAIKimi K3
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$3.00/M tokens
Output$15.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.30/M tokens
Chat with Qwen2.5 VL 72BGo to model
Chat with Kimi K3Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen2.5 VL 72B vs Kimi K3▼

Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B or Kimi K3?

▼

Both Qwen2.5 VL 72B and Kimi K3 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 VL 72B or Kimi K3?

▼

Qwen2.5 VL 72B has a lower blended cost. Qwen2.5 VL 72B: $0.80 input / $1.00 output. Kimi K3: $3.00 input / $15.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen2.5 VL 72B or Kimi K3?

▼

Kimi K3 has a larger context window: Qwen2.5 VL 72B supports 128K tokens vs Kimi K3 at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen2.5 VL 72B and Kimi K3 support vision?

▼

Yes, both Qwen2.5 VL 72B and Kimi K3 support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Qwen2.5 VL 72B and Kimi K3?

▼

Key differences: Qwen2.5 VL 72B is significantly cheaper; only Kimi K3 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen2.5 VL 72B and Kimi K3 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Secrets
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Learn
  • Free tools
  • Prompts
  • Templates
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)