Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Actions
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

At a glance

Efficient 30B MoE coding model with only 3B active parameters.

262K ctx$0.07/$0.28 per M

NVIDIA's open multimodal mixture-of-experts model, with 12B active parameters out of 120B total.

262K ctx$0.10/$0.40 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper30%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Specs
262K
Context
236K
Max output
Jul 2025
Released
262K
Context
236K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input30%$0.07/M tokens
Output30%$0.28/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.10/M tokens
Output$0.40/M tokens
Cache read$0.08/M tokens
Chat with Qwen3 Coder 30B A3BGo to model
Chat with Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL▼

Which is better, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

▼

Both Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

▼

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B has a lower blended cost. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B: $0.07 input / $0.28 output. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: $0.10 input / $0.40 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

▼

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B has a larger context window: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B supports 262K tokens vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL at 262K tokens.

Do both Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL support vision?

▼

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

▼

Key differences: only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL supports vision input; only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App