Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B vs GLM 5.3 Flash

At a glance

Efficient 30B MoE coding model with only 3B active parameters.

160K ctx$0.07/$0.27 per M

Z.ai's efficient multimodal model for fast coding and long-horizon agent tasks.

1.0M ctx$0.07/$0.25 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper1%
Specs
160K
Context
33K
Max output
Jul 2025
Released
1.0M
Context
131K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input7%$0.07/M tokens
Output$0.27/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.07/M tokens
Output7%$0.25/M tokens
Cache read$0.01/M tokens
Chat with Qwen3 Coder 30B A3BGo to model
Chat with GLM 5.3 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B vs GLM 5.3 Flash▼

Which is better, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Both Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and GLM 5.3 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash has a lower blended cost. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B: $0.07 input / $0.27 output. GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.07 input / $0.25 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash has a larger context window: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B supports 160K tokens vs GLM 5.3 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and GLM 5.3 Flash support vision?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Key differences: only GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision input; only GLM 5.3 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and GLM 5.3 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App