Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Actions
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B vs GLM 5.3 Flash

At a glance

Efficient 30B MoE coding model with only 3B active parameters.

262K ctx$0.07/$0.28 per M

Z.ai's efficient multimodal model for fast coding and long-horizon agent tasks.

1.0M ctx$0.15/$0.50 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper48%
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—
Math
Competition Math—
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-10-02
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science90.2%
Math
Competition Math93.9%
Specs
262K
Context
236K
Max output
Jul 2025
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input53%$0.07/M tokens
Output44%$0.28/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.15/M tokens
Output$0.50/M tokens
Cache read$0.03/M tokens
Chat with Qwen3 Coder 30B A3BGo to model
Chat with GLM 5.3 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B vs GLM 5.3 Flash▼

Which is better, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Both Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and GLM 5.3 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B has a lower blended cost. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B: $0.07 input / $0.28 output. GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.15 input / $0.50 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash has a larger context window: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B supports 262K tokens vs GLM 5.3 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and GLM 5.3 Flash support vision?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Key differences: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B is significantly cheaper; only GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision input; only GLM 5.3 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B and GLM 5.3 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App