Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.
Google's fourth-generation open dense model with native multimodal understanding.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.
Both Qwen3 Coder Next and Gemma 4 31B are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Gemma 4 31B has a lower blended cost. Qwen3 Coder Next: $0.11 input / $0.80 output. Gemma 4 31B: $0.12 input / $0.37 output.
Qwen3 Coder Next has a larger context window: Qwen3 Coder Next supports 262K tokens vs Gemma 4 31B at 262K tokens.
Gemma 4 31B supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Coder Next does not.
Key differences: only Gemma 4 31B supports vision input; only Gemma 4 31B offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 Coder Next and Gemma 4 31B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.