Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Actions
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Qwen3 Max Thinking vs GLM 5.3 Flash

At a glance

Flagship reasoning model for complex multi-step tasks.

77262K ctx#38/92

Z.ai's efficient multimodal model for fast coding and long-horizon agent tasks.

1.0M ctx$0.15/$0.50 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI· as of 2026-10-02
Capability
CapabilityECI76.5
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science72.6%Factual Recall48.7%
Math
Math Problems97.1%Competition Math73.3%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-10-02
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science24%90.2%Factual Recall—
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math28%93.9%
Specs
262K
Context
66K
Max output
—
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Pricing not available
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.15/M tokens
Output$0.50/M tokens
Cache read$0.03/M tokens
Chat with Qwen3 Max ThinkingGo to model
Chat with GLM 5.3 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3 Max Thinking vs GLM 5.3 Flash▼

Which is better, Qwen3 Max Thinking or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Both Qwen3 Max Thinking and GLM 5.3 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Max Thinking or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash has a larger context window: Qwen3 Max Thinking supports 262K tokens vs GLM 5.3 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen3 Max Thinking and GLM 5.3 Flash support vision?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Max Thinking does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen3 Max Thinking and GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Key differences: only GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision input; only GLM 5.3 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 Max Thinking and GLM 5.3 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App