Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemma 4 31B

At a glance

Next-generation 80B MoE model with always-on reasoning mode.

262K ctx$0.15/$1.20 per M

Google's fourth-generation open dense model with native multimodal understanding.

262K ctx$0.20/$0.40 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—Factual Recall—
Math
Competition Math—
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-10-02
Cheaper39%
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science75.8%Factual Recall10.4%
Math
Competition Math73.3%
Specs
262K
Context
236K
Max output
Sep 2025
Released
262K
Context
16K
Max output
Apr 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input25%$0.15/M tokens
Output$1.20/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.20/M tokens
Output67%$0.40/M tokens
Chat with Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingGo to model
Chat with Gemma 4 31BGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemma 4 31B▼

Which is better, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Gemma 4 31B are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Gemma 4 31B has a lower blended cost. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: $0.15 input / $1.20 output. Gemma 4 31B: $0.20 input / $0.40 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a larger context window: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking supports 262K tokens vs Gemma 4 31B at 262K tokens.

Do both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Gemma 4 31B support vision?

▼

Gemma 4 31B supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Key differences: only Gemma 4 31B supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Gemma 4 31B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App