Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GLM 5.3 Flash

At a glance

Next-generation 80B MoE model with always-on reasoning mode.

131K ctx$0.10/$0.78 per M

Z.ai's efficient multimodal model for fast coding and long-horizon agent tasks.

1.0M ctx$0.07/$0.25 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper56%
Specs
131K
Context
33K
Max output
Sep 2025
Released
1.0M
Context
131K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.10/M tokens
Output$0.78/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input23%$0.07/M tokens
Output68%$0.25/M tokens
Cache read$0.01/M tokens
Chat with Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingGo to model
Chat with GLM 5.3 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GLM 5.3 Flash▼

Which is better, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GLM 5.3 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash has a lower blended cost. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: $0.10 input / $0.78 output. GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.07 input / $0.25 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash has a larger context window: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens vs GLM 5.3 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GLM 5.3 Flash support vision?

▼

GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GLM 5.3 Flash?

▼

Key differences: only GLM 5.3 Flash supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and GLM 5.3 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App