Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free trial
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Qwen3 VL 32B vs Gemma 4 31B

At a glance

32B dense vision-language model for high-quality multimodal tasks.

131K ctx$0.10/$0.42 per M

Google's fourth-generation open dense model with native multimodal understanding.

262K ctx$0.12/$0.37 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper
Reasoning & Knowledge
Factual Recall—
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Reasoning & Knowledge
Factual Recall9.6%
Specs
131K
Context
33K
Max output
Oct 2025
Released
262K
Context
16K
Max output
Apr 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input13%$0.10/M tokens
Output$0.42/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.12/M tokens
Output11%$0.37/M tokens
Chat with Qwen3 VL 32BGo to model
Chat with Gemma 4 31BGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3 VL 32B vs Gemma 4 31B▼

Which is better, Qwen3 VL 32B or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Both Qwen3 VL 32B and Gemma 4 31B are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 32B or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Qwen3 VL 32B has a lower blended cost. Qwen3 VL 32B: $0.10 input / $0.42 output. Gemma 4 31B: $0.12 input / $0.37 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 VL 32B or Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Gemma 4 31B has a larger context window: Qwen3 VL 32B supports 131K tokens vs Gemma 4 31B at 262K tokens.

Do both Qwen3 VL 32B and Gemma 4 31B support vision?

▼

Yes, both Qwen3 VL 32B and Gemma 4 31B support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Qwen3 VL 32B and Gemma 4 31B?

▼

Key differences: only Gemma 4 31B offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 VL 32B and Gemma 4 31B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App