Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5

At a glance

Alibaba's fast multimodal Qwen3.8 model for high-volume agentic work.

1M ctx$0.15/$0.47 per M

Anthropic's fast, low-cost Claude Haiku for high-volume work, succeeding Claude Haiku 4.5.

1M ctx$0.10/$0.50 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper13%
Specs
1M
Context
131K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
1M
Context
128K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.15/M tokens
Output6%$0.47/M tokens
Cache read$0.02/M tokens
Cache write$0.20/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input33%$0.10/M tokens
Output$0.50/M tokens
Cache read38%$0.01/M tokens
Cache write37%$0.13/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with Qwen3.8 FlashGo to model
Chat with Claude Haiku 5.5Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5▼

Which is better, Qwen3.8 Flash or Claude Haiku 5.5?

▼

Both Qwen3.8 Flash and Claude Haiku 5.5 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Flash or Claude Haiku 5.5?

▼

Claude Haiku 5.5 has a lower blended cost. Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.15 input / $0.47 output. Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 input / $0.50 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.8 Flash or Claude Haiku 5.5?

▼

Qwen3.8 Flash has a larger context window: Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Claude Haiku 5.5 at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen3.8 Flash and Claude Haiku 5.5 support vision?

▼

Yes, both Qwen3.8 Flash and Claude Haiku 5.5 support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Qwen3.8 Flash and Claude Haiku 5.5?

▼

Qwen3.8 Flash and Claude Haiku 5.5 have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3.8 Flash and Claude Haiku 5.5 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App