Reflection's open-weight reasoning model for coding and long-horizon agentic workflows.
Anthropic's Sonnet-class model for well-scoped everyday work, a direct upgrade over Claude Sonnet 5.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Claude Sonnet 5.5 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Beam 1.0 501B A23B has a lower blended cost. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: $1.00 input / $3.00 output. Claude Sonnet 5.5: $2.00 input / $10.00 output.
Beam 1.0 501B A23B has a larger context window: Beam 1.0 501B A23B supports 1M tokens vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 at 1M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 supports vision/image input, but Beam 1.0 501B A23B does not.
Key differences: only Claude Sonnet 5.5 supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Claude Sonnet 5.5 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.