xAI's new flagship for coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work, succeeding Grok 4.6 with its longest reinforcement learning run yet.
Fast and efficient with near-frontier intelligence.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Grok 4.7 and Claude Haiku 4.5 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a lower blended cost. Grok 4.7: $2.00 input / $6.00 output. Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output.
Grok 4.7 has a larger context window: Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens vs Claude Haiku 4.5 at 200K tokens.
Yes, both Grok 4.7 and Claude Haiku 4.5 support vision/image input.
Grok 4.7 and Claude Haiku 4.5 have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Grok 4.7 and Claude Haiku 4.5 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.