Xiaomi's open-source efficiency model: a 309B MoE with 15B active parameters per token and a hybrid attention mechanism.
Alibaba's updated Qwen3.8 Max flagship snapshot, post-trained for coding and agentic work.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both MiMo V2.6 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
MiMo V2.6 Flash has a lower blended cost. MiMo V2.6 Flash: $0.14 input / $0.28 output. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): $2.00 input / $6.00 output.
MiMo V2.6 Flash has a larger context window: MiMo V2.6 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) at 1M tokens.
Yes, both MiMo V2.6 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) support vision/image input.
Key differences: MiMo V2.6 Flash is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both MiMo V2.6 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.