Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT 4.1 Nano
Fast and efficient with near-frontier intelligence.
Fastest and cheapest model in the GPT-4.1 series for low-latency applications.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT 4.1 Nano▼
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT 4.1 Nano?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher (75.3 vs 64.4). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT 4.1 Nano?
▼
GPT 4.1 Nano has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output. GPT 4.1 Nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT 4.1 Nano?
▼
GPT 4.1 Nano has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens vs GPT 4.1 Nano at 1M tokens.
Do both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT 4.1 Nano support vision?
▼
Yes, both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT 4.1 Nano support vision/image input.
What are the key differences between Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT 4.1 Nano?
▼
Key differences: Claude Haiku 4.5 has a notably higher capability index (10.9 point gap); GPT 4.1 Nano is significantly cheaper; only Claude Haiku 4.5 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT 4.1 Nano for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.