Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 4.5 Air

At a glance
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5

Fast and efficient with near-frontier intelligence.

75200K ctx$1.00/$5.00 per M#41/92
Zhipu AIGLM 4.5 Air

Lightweight GLM 4.5 variant for fast, cost-efficient inference.

131K ctx$0.13/$0.85 per M
AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI75.3
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science60.5%Expert-Level—
Math
Math Problems86.9%Competition Math35.8%Research Math4.1%
Agentic
Terminal Tasks29.8%Novel Reasoning1.3%
Zhipu AIGLM 4.5 Air
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—Expert-Level8.1%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math—Research Math—
Agentic
Terminal Tasks—Novel Reasoning—
Specs
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
200K
Context
64K
Max output
Oct 2025
Released
Zhipu AIGLM 4.5 Air
131K
Context
98K
Max output
Jul 2025
Released
Capabilities
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Zhipu AIGLM 4.5 Air
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.00/M tokens
Output$5.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.10/M tokens
Cache write$1.25/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Zhipu AIGLM 4.5 Air
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.13/M tokens
Output$0.85/M tokens
Cache read$0.02/M tokens
Chat with Claude Haiku 4.5Go to model
Chat with GLM 4.5 AirGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 4.5 Air▼

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM 4.5 Air?

▼

Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.5 Air are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM 4.5 Air?

▼

GLM 4.5 Air has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output. GLM 4.5 Air: $0.13 input / $0.85 output.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM 4.5 Air?

▼

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens vs GLM 4.5 Air at 131K tokens.

Do both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.5 Air support vision?

▼

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports vision/image input, but GLM 4.5 Air does not.

What are the key differences between Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.5 Air?

▼

Key differences: GLM 4.5 Air is significantly cheaper; only Claude Haiku 4.5 supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.5 Air for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Secrets
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Learn
  • Free tools
  • Prompts
  • Templates
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)