Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT 4.1 Nano
Anthropic's most capable Opus yet, built for long-horizon autonomous agents and frontier coding.
Fastest and cheapest model in the GPT-4.1 series for low-latency applications.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT 4.1 Nano▼
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT 4.1 Nano?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher (89.2 vs 64.4). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT 4.1 Nano?
▼
GPT 4.1 Nano has a lower blended cost. Claude Opus 4.8: $5.00 input / $25.00 output. GPT 4.1 Nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT 4.1 Nano?
▼
GPT 4.1 Nano has a larger context window: Claude Opus 4.8 supports 1M tokens vs GPT 4.1 Nano at 1M tokens.
Do both Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT 4.1 Nano support vision?
▼
Yes, both Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT 4.1 Nano support vision/image input.
What are the key differences between Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT 4.1 Nano?
▼
Key differences: Claude Opus 4.8 has a notably higher capability index (24.8 point gap); GPT 4.1 Nano is significantly cheaper; only Claude Opus 4.8 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT 4.1 Nano for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.