Claude Opus 4 vs GLM 5.2
World-class coding model with sustained performance on complex agentic tasks.
Z.ai's frontier reasoning model for long-context agents and software engineering.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Opus 4 vs GLM 5.2▼
Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or GLM 5.2?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, GLM 5.2 scores higher (83.4 vs 75.4). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4 or GLM 5.2?
▼
GLM 5.2 has a lower blended cost. Claude Opus 4: $15.00 input / $75.00 output. GLM 5.2: $1.40 input / $4.40 output.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4 or GLM 5.2?
▼
GLM 5.2 has a larger context window: Claude Opus 4 supports 200K tokens vs GLM 5.2 at 262K tokens.
Do both Claude Opus 4 and GLM 5.2 support vision?
▼
Claude Opus 4 supports vision/image input, but GLM 5.2 does not.
Which has better coding performance, Claude Opus 4 or GLM 5.2?
▼
GLM 5.2 scores higher on SWE-bench Verified: Claude Opus 4 resolves 71% vs GLM 5.2 at 79%.
What are the key differences between Claude Opus 4 and GLM 5.2?
▼
Key differences: GLM 5.2 has a notably higher capability index (8.0 point gap); GLM 5.2 is significantly cheaper; only Claude Opus 4 supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Opus 4 and GLM 5.2 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.