DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.1
Open-source 1.6T-parameter MoE with 49B active, built for advanced reasoning and long-horizon agents.
Zhipu AI's most capable model with a major leap in coding and long-horizon task performance.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.1▼
Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.1?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, GLM 5.1 scores higher (82.3 vs 81.6). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.1?
▼
DeepSeek V4 Pro has a lower blended cost. DeepSeek V4 Pro: $0.43 input / $0.87 output. GLM 5.1: $0.98 input / $3.08 output.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.1?
▼
DeepSeek V4 Pro has a larger context window: DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1M tokens vs GLM 5.1 at 203K tokens.
Which has better coding performance, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.1?
▼
DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on SWE-bench Verified: DeepSeek V4 Pro resolves 78% vs GLM 5.1 at 74%.
What are the key differences between DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.1?
▼
Key differences: DeepSeek V4 Pro is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.1 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.