Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Google's frontier model with a large leap in core reasoning.
Fast and accurate with enhanced coding and tool use capabilities.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude 3.5 Haiku▼
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Claude 3.5 Haiku?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (86.4 vs 61.4). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Claude 3.5 Haiku?
▼
Claude 3.5 Haiku has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.1 Pro: $2.00 input / $12.00 output. Claude 3.5 Haiku: $0.80 input / $4.00 output.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Claude 3.5 Haiku?
▼
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a larger context window: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1M tokens vs Claude 3.5 Haiku at 200K tokens.
Do both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude 3.5 Haiku support vision?
▼
Yes, both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude 3.5 Haiku support vision/image input.
What are the key differences between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude 3.5 Haiku?
▼
Key differences: Gemini 3.1 Pro has a notably higher capability index (25.0 point gap); Claude 3.5 Haiku is significantly cheaper; only Gemini 3.1 Pro offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude 3.5 Haiku for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.