Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.5
Google's frontier model with a large leap in core reasoning.
Anthropic's frontier reasoning model for complex software engineering and agentic workflows.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.5▼
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Claude Opus 4.5?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (86.4 vs 81.4). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Claude Opus 4.5?
▼
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.1 Pro: $2.00 input / $12.00 output. Claude Opus 4.5: $5.00 input / $25.00 output.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Claude Opus 4.5?
▼
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a larger context window: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1M tokens vs Claude Opus 4.5 at 200K tokens.
Do both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Opus 4.5 support vision?
▼
Yes, both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Opus 4.5 support vision/image input.
Which has better coding performance, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Claude Opus 4.5?
▼
Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on SWE-bench Verified: Gemini 3.1 Pro resolves 81% vs Claude Opus 4.5 at 77%.
What are the key differences between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Opus 4.5?
▼
Key differences: Gemini 3.1 Pro is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Opus 4.5 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.